It looks like a booby trap, Sarge
In April this year I went to Melbourne for the wedding of the son of a school friend. After partially completing my mission of consoling my friend while she lost her only son and gained a daughter I decided we needed a pick-me-up. So we tootled off to the Barossa valley to visit the wineries.
On day two in the Barossa I developed a stiff neck and debilitating headache. No, not a hangover, an actual headache. ‘Get me an osteopath’ I groaned.
My friend went into the tourist information office in Tanunda (pop 400). Resourceful but slightly optimistic I thought, having had experience of tourist information services in the UK. I was proved wrong as she came back with the goods: Hand to Health Chiropractic, Dr Kylie Salter, 84 Murray Street. Practically next door to the bookshop I had stumbled into to divert myself with the latest Nordic Noir.
One crick and I was mended.
‘What has this got to do with tax?’ I hear you asking. Well nothing... but I have now kept my promise to the excellent Dr Salter and mentioned her in these dispatches.
With a link worthy of Alan Titchmarsh on daytime TV I will get to the (tax) point.
I have just read that HMRC have decided to tax what is, scarily enough, fast becoming one of the UK’s favourite pastimes: cosmetic surgery.
It seems that what happened was that HMRC redrafted its public notice intended for health professionals and sent that redraft to the British Association of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons (BAAPS) for their comments. The redrafted text made it clear that HMRC's view was that while cosmetic procedures carried out for therapeutic purposes were exempt from VAT (when carried out by or under the supervision of ‘health professionals’ or when carried out in a hospital), any other procedure was liable to VAT at the standard rate of 20%.
BAAPS felt that this amounted to HMRC proposing to change their interpretation of the law as to date VAT has been charged only on non-surgical cosmetic procedures.
Having first denied that they were changing anything, it seems that this has now been filed in the ‘too difficult’ drawer by HMRC and the proposed amendments to the public notice have been shelved. But where does this leave matters?
The relevant UK law refers to the provision of medical care or surgical treatment as exempt from VAT. There is no test of purpose. Call me old-fashioned but last time I looked the law was as enacted by Parliament.
|Tax and taxis 07.01.11|
|SDLT: a double whammy 20.01.11|
|Rabbit in the headlights 10.02.11|
|Some like it hot 15.03.11|
|Bon voyage 25.04.11|
|Saving a stamp 30.05.11|
|A few home truths 10.06.11|
|A sting in the ale 20.07.11|
|Red Queen Syndrome 15.08.11|
|Here be dragons 15.09.11|
|It looks like a booby trap, Sarge 20.10.11|
|A lunatic by any other name 24.11.11|
|Christmas crackers 14.12.11|
|Bad language 21.01.10|
|Is there anybody out there? 09.02.10|
|Château Thames Embankment 14.03.10|
|Send the (c)ash 14.04.10|
|What a waste 13.05.10|
|MiPod: a matter of taste 06.06.10|
|June bug: A turn around the floor with George and Vince 23.06.10|
|Food for thought? 28.08.10|
|Ain't nobody here but us chickens 30.08.10|
|Are HMRC missing a trick? 22.09.10|
|Welcome to my world 20.10.10|
|Out, damned spot 31.10.10|
|Talking turkey 25.11.10|
|Bright lights, black socks 30.11.10|
|Blogger's block? 06.12.10|
|Spilling the beans or it's a mug's game 14.12.10|