Solicitors & tax specialists

Ann L Humphrey

From complexity to simplicity


Articles

Some more examples of Ann Humphrey's writings on tax matters:


SDLT and bare trusts (September 2011)
As I explained in my earlier piece for LawSkills, the SDLT legislation distinguishes between bare trusts and settlements ...Read more >


SDLT and trustees: a reminder (August 2011)
SDLT can be overlooked in trust situations. For example, an SDLT charge may arise where an appointment of land is made from an estate ...Read more >


SDLT: trees and PIPs (June 2011)
We are aware that FA 2003, Sch 15 para 14 now limits a charge to stamp duty land tax on transfers of partnership interests ...Read more >


SDLT: which value? (May 2011)
A client is considering leasing a property, which he owns personally, to a company that is connected ...Read more >


Please re-lease me (March 2010)
We are increasingly coming across renewal of leases and, in accordance with normal practice, we have claimed the professional fees as allowable ...Read more >


SDLT: partnership dissolution (December 2009)
I am dealing with the dissolution of a family farming partnership of three brothers where one (the continuing farmer) will receive the farmland...Read more >


Purchase of own shares: payment in cash or kind? (December 2009)
A client company of ours is looking to purchase its own shares by transferring a property to a retiring shareholder instead of paying cash...Read more >


SDLT: assignment at a loss (May 2009)
Our client, A, agreed to purchase a flat off-plan for £450,000 and entered into an agreement for lease. Unfortunately, having been made redundant...Read more >


SDLT Update for Property Lawyers
This presentation covered the changes to the SDLT regime introduced by the 2009 Budget and also highlighted some points which had cropped up in practice over the previous twelve months.


VAT and Property Transactions
This hour-long workshop was devised for the property group of a medium-sized law firm and began by considering the VAT conundrum facing many a property lawyer – the taxable/exempt distinction and why it matters. Members of the firm were invited to send in their VAT queries in advance and these formed the basis of a question and answer session.

SDLT: partnership dissolution (December 2009)

I am dealing with the dissolution of a family farming partnership of three brothers where one (the continuing farmer) will receive the farmland belonging to the partnership in satisfaction of his partnership capital account. I am aware that, as all the parties are connected, a transfer from a continuing partnership would not result in a stamp duty land tax charge. However, is the position any different if the transfer is in connection with dissolving the partnership?

 

Paragraph 18(7) Schedule 15 FA 2003, appears to suggest that it is not. Will any delay in transferring the land mean that it is not treated as made out of a partnership (that no longer exists), i.e. a transfer by individuals for consideration?

 

Also, what happens if the assets cannot be distributed straight away and the land is rented to the farming brother in the interim (i.e. the land continues to be owned by all three until matters are finally brought to a conclusion)?

 

Query 17,516 – Farm Hand

 

Answer:

  

Paragraphs 18 to 24 Schedule 15 FA 2003 apply where a chargeable interest is transferred from a partnership to a person who is or has been one of the partners for his personal benefit. There is a transfer of a chargeable interest from a partnership where a chargeable interest that was partnership property ceases to be partnership property (paragraph 37 Schedule 15). Partnership property is an interest or right in property held by or on behalf of the partnership or the members of the partnership for the purposes of the partnership business (paragraph 34(1) Schedule 15). It is expressly provided in paragraph 18(7) Schedule 15 that property which was partnership property before dissolution or other cessation of a partnership is treated as remaining as partnership property until it is distributed so it makes no difference if the distribution does not take place immediately the partnership is dissolved.

 

As the partners are connected by reason of being siblings, Farm Hand is correct that no charge to SDLT will arise in this case.  In any event, where the chargeable interest in question was transferred to the partnership on or after 20th October 2003 but the transfer was stamped or SDLT was paid, even in a case where the partners are not connected, a charge to SDLT would arise only on the proportion of the market value of the property interest transferred on which tax has not previously been paid. This proportion is calculated by a statutory formula (set out in paragraphs 21 and 22 Schedule 15) which takes account of increases or decreases in partnership shares since the property was transferred to partnership.

 

Marilyn Merlot (Ann Humphrey)

 

First published in Taxation magazine Readers’ Forum www.taxation.co.uk